Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscriptions
Total
1753 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-45046 | 6 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 61 Log4j, Debian Linux, Fedora and 58 more | 2024-06-27 | 9.0 Critical |
| It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23841 | 7 Apple, Debian, Netapp and 4 more | 23 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 20 more | 2024-06-26 | 5.9 Medium |
| The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x). | ||||
| CVE-2022-40225 | 1 Siemens | 2 Siplus Tim 1531 Irc, Siplus Tim 1531 Irc Firmware | 2024-06-24 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPLUS TIM 1531 IRC (6AG1543-1MX00-7XE0) (All versions < V2.4.8), TIM 1531 IRC (6GK7543-1MX00-0XE0) (All versions < V2.4.8). Casting an internal value could lead to floating point exception under certain circumstances. This could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service condition on affected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4160 | 4 Debian, Openssl, Oracle and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Openssl, Enterprise Manager Ops Center and 5 more | 2024-06-24 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb). | ||||
| CVE-2022-2097 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 12 more | 2024-06-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p). | ||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 7 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 4 more | 32 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 29 more | 2024-06-21 | 7.4 High |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | ||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 12 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 9 more | 167 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 164 more | 2024-06-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | ||||
| CVE-2021-23839 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Siemens | 8 Openssl, Business Intelligence, Enterprise Manager For Storage Management and 5 more | 2024-06-21 | 3.7 Low |
| OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x). | ||||
| CVE-2020-1971 | 8 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 5 more | 46 Debian Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 43 more | 2024-06-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w). | ||||
| CVE-2023-45205 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sicam Pas\/pqs | 2024-06-12 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM PAS/PQS (All versions >= V8.00 < V8.20). The affected application is installed with specific files and folders with insecure permissions. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to inject arbitrary code and escalate privileges to `NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM`. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38640 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sicam Pas\/pqs | 2024-06-11 | 4.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM PAS/PQS (All versions >= V8.00 < V8.22). The affected application is installed with specific files and folders with insecure permissions. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to read and modify configuration data in the context of the application process. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49691 | 1 Siemens | 40 6gk5615-0aa00-2aa2, 6gk5615-0aa00-2aa2 Firmware, 6gk5615-0aa01-2aa2 and 37 more | 2024-06-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.0), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (Annex A) (6GK5812-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (Annex B) (6GK5812-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (Annex A) (6GK5816-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (Annex B) (6GK5816-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M876-3 (EVDO) (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE S615 (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE S615 EEC (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.0), SCALANCE SC622-2C (6GK5622-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE SC626-2C (6GK5626-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE SC632-2C (6GK5632-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE SC636-2C (6GK5636-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE SC642-2C (6GK5642-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE SC646-2C (6GK5646-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.0.2), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (ME) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DC0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-7DB0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DC0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TC0) (All versions), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3AB0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (US) (6GK5763-1AL00-3DB0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (ME) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DC0) (All versions), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0) (All versions). An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command with root privileges vulnerability exists in the handling of the DDNS configuration. This could allow malicious local administrators to issue commands on system level after a successful IP address update. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44374 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2024-06-11 | 8.8 High |
| Affected devices allow to change the password, but insufficiently check which password is to be changed. With this an authenticated attacker could, under certain conditions, be able to change the password of another, potential admin user allowing her to escalate her privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44373 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2024-06-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. Follow-up of CVE-2022-36323. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44321 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2024-06-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| Affected devices do not properly validate the length of inputs when performing certain configuration changes in the web interface allowing an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service condition. The device needs to be restarted for the web interface to become available again. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44319 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2024-06-11 | 4.9 Medium |
| Affected devices use a weak checksum algorithm to protect the configuration backup that an administrator can export from the device. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges or an attacker that tricks a legitimate administrator to upload a modified configuration file to change the configuration of an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44318 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2024-06-11 | 4.9 Medium |
| Affected devices use a hardcoded key to obfuscate the configuration backup that an administrator can export from the device. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges or an attacker that obtains a configuration backup to extract configuration information from the exported file. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44317 | 1 Siemens | 138 Scalance Xb205-3 \(sc\, Pn\), Scalance Xb205-3 \(sc\, Pn\) Firmware, Scalance Xb205-3 \(st\, E\/ip\) and 135 more | 2024-06-11 | 7.2 High |
| Affected products do not properly validate the content of uploaded X509 certificates which could allow an attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary code on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38532 | 1 Siemens | 2 Parasolid, Teamcenter Visualization | 2024-06-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.258), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.254), Parasolid V35.1 (All versions < V35.1.171), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions < V14.1.0.11), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.6), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.3). The affected application contains a stack exhaustion vulnerability while parsing a specially crafted X_T file. This could allow an attacker to cause denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38531 | 1 Siemens | 2 Parasolid, Teamcenter Visualization | 2024-06-11 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.258), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.254), Parasolid V35.1 (All versions < V35.1.184), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.9), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0004). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||