Filtered by vendor Qos Subscriptions
Total 10 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2018-8088 3 Oracle, Qos, Redhat 14 Goldengate Application Adapters, Goldengate Stream Analytics, Utilities Framework and 11 more 2023-12-27 9.8 Critical
org.slf4j.ext.EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J before 1.8.0-beta2 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted data. EventData in the slf4j-ext module in QOS.CH SLF4J, has been fixed in SLF4J versions 1.7.26 later and in the 2.0.x series.
CVE-2023-6481 1 Qos 1 Logback 2023-12-07 7.5 High
A serialization vulnerability in logback receiver component part of logback version 1.4.13, 1.3.13 and 1.2.12 allows an attacker to mount a Denial-Of-Service attack by sending poisoned data.
CVE-2023-6378 1 Qos 1 Logback 2023-12-05 7.5 High
A serialization vulnerability in logback receiver component part of logback version 1.4.11 allows an attacker to mount a Denial-Of-Service attack by sending poisoned data.
CVE-2020-9493 2 Apache, Qos 3 Chainsaw, Log4j, Reload4j 2023-11-07 9.8 Critical
A deserialization flaw was found in Apache Chainsaw versions prior to 2.1.0 which could lead to malicious code execution.
CVE-2020-9488 4 Apache, Debian, Oracle and 1 more 46 Log4j, Debian Linux, Communications Application Session Controller and 43 more 2023-11-07 3.7 Low
Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1
CVE-2017-5929 2 Qos, Redhat 3 Logback, Satellite, Satellite Capsule 2023-11-07 9.8 Critical
QOS.ch Logback before 1.2.0 has a serialization vulnerability affecting the SocketServer and ServerSocketReceiver components.
CVE-2022-23302 5 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 2 more 26 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 23 more 2023-02-24 8.8 High
JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2022-23305 5 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 2 more 28 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 25 more 2023-02-24 9.8 Critical
By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not the default. Beginning in version 2.0-beta8, the JDBCAppender was re-introduced with proper support for parameterized SQL queries and further customization over the columns written to in logs. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions.
CVE-2022-23307 3 Apache, Oracle, Qos 26 Chainsaw, Log4j, Advanced Supply Chain Planning and 23 more 2023-02-24 8.8 High
CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists.
CVE-2021-42550 4 Netapp, Qos, Redhat and 1 more 6 Cloud Manager, Service Level Manager, Snap Creator Framework and 3 more 2022-12-12 6.6 Medium
In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.