Filtered by vendor Kubernetes
Subscriptions
Total
90 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-4318 | 3 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes, Redhat | 8 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Cri-o and 5 more | 2024-06-04 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in cri-o. This issue allows the addition of arbitrary lines into /etc/passwd by use of a specially crafted environment variable. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1260 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kube-apiserver, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-05-03 | 8.0 High |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered in kube-apiserver. This issue could allow a remote, authenticated attacker who has been given permissions "update, patch" the "pods/ephemeralcontainers" subresource beyond what the default is. They would then need to create a new pod or patch one that they already have access to. This might allow evasion of SCC admission restrictions, thereby gaining control of a privileged pod. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5044 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2024-03-07 | 8.8 High |
| Code injection via nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/permanent-redirect annotation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5043 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2024-03-07 | 8.8 High |
| Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4886 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Ingress-nginx | 2024-03-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| Ingress-nginx `path` sanitization can be bypassed with `log_format` directive. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5528 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2024-01-19 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods and persistent volumes on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using an in-tree storage plugin for Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3955 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-12-21 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3893 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Csi Proxy | 2023-12-21 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes running kubernetes-csi-proxy may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes running kubernetes-csi-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3172 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Apiserver | 2023-12-21 | 8.2 High |
| A security issue was discovered in kube-apiserver that allows an aggregated API server to redirect client traffic to any URL. This could lead to the client performing unexpected actions as well as forwarding the client's API server credentials to third parties. | ||||
| CVE-2021-25736 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-12-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| Kube-proxy on Windows can unintentionally forward traffic to local processes listening on the same port (“spec.ports[*].port”) as a LoadBalancer Service when the LoadBalancer controller does not set the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field. Clusters where the LoadBalancer controller sets the “status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip” field are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3676 | 2 Kubernetes, Microsoft | 2 Kubernetes, Windows | 2023-11-30 | 8.8 High |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate to admin privileges on those nodes. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they include Windows nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3466 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Cri-o, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| The version of cri-o as released for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.9.48, 4.10.31, and 4.11.6 via RHBA-2022:6316, RHBA-2022:6257, and RHBA-2022:6658, respectively, included an incorrect version of cri-o missing the fix for CVE-2022-27652, which was previously fixed in OCP 4.9.41 and 4.10.12 via RHBA-2022:5433 and RHSA-2022:1600. This issue could allow an attacker with access to programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set when execve(2) runs. For more details, see https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-27652. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8570 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Java | 2023-11-07 | 9.1 Critical |
| Kubernetes Java client libraries in version 10.0.0 and versions prior to 9.0.1 allow writes to paths outside of the current directory when copying multiple files from a remote pod which sends a maliciously crafted archive. This can potentially overwrite any files on the system of the process executing the client code. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8555 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 6.3 Medium |
| The Kubernetes kube-controller-manager in versions v1.0-1.14, versions prior to v1.15.12, v1.16.9, v1.17.5, and version v1.18.0 are vulnerable to a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) that allows certain authorized users to leak up to 500 bytes of arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints within the master's host network (such as link-local or loopback services). | ||||
| CVE-2020-8554 | 2 Kubernetes, Oracle | 4 Kubernetes, Communications Cloud Native Core Network Slice Selection Function, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 Medium |
| Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typically be granted to users) of a LoadBalancer service can set the status.loadBalancer.ingress.ip to similar effect. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8552 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Kubernetes API server component in versions prior to 1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via successful API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8551 | 2 Fedoraproject, Kubernetes | 2 Fedora, Kubernetes | 2023-11-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Kubelet component in versions 1.15.0-1.15.9, 1.16.0-1.16.6, and 1.17.0-1.17.2 has been found to be vulnerable to a denial of service attack via the kubelet API, including the unauthenticated HTTP read-only API typically served on port 10255, and the authenticated HTTPS API typically served on port 10250. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9946 | 3 Cncf, Kubernetes, Netapp | 3 Portmap, Kubernetes, Cloud Insights | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) CNI (Container Networking Interface) 0.7.4 has a network firewall misconfiguration which affects Kubernetes. The CNI 'portmap' plugin, used to setup HostPorts for CNI, inserts rules at the front of the iptables nat chains; which take precedence over the KUBE- SERVICES chain. Because of this, the HostPort/portmap rule could match incoming traffic even if there were better fitting, more specific service definition rules like NodePorts later in the chain. The issue is fixed in CNI 0.7.5 and Kubernetes 1.11.9, 1.12.7, 1.13.5, and 1.14.0. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11255 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 4 External-provisioner, External-resizer, External-snapshotter and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation in Kubernetes CSI sidecar containers for external-provisioner (<v0.4.3, <v1.0.2, v1.1, <v1.2.2, <v1.3.1), external-snapshotter (<v0.4.2, <v1.0.2, v1.1, <1.2.2), and external-resizer (v0.1, v0.2) could result in unauthorized PersistentVolume data access or volume mutation during snapshot, restore from snapshot, cloning and resizing operations. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11253 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in the Kubernetes API server in versions v1.0-1.12 and versions prior to v1.13.12, v1.14.8, v1.15.5, and v1.16.2 allows authorized users to send malicious YAML or JSON payloads, causing the API server to consume excessive CPU or memory, potentially crashing and becoming unavailable. Prior to v1.14.0, default RBAC policy authorized anonymous users to submit requests that could trigger this vulnerability. Clusters upgraded from a version prior to v1.14.0 keep the more permissive policy by default for backwards compatibility. | ||||