Total
105 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-23120 | 1 Trendnet | 2 Tv-ip651wi, Tv-ip651wi Firmware | 2023-02-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| The use of the cyclic redundancy check (CRC) algorithm for integrity check during firmware update makes TRENDnet TV-IP651WI Network Camera firmware version v1.07.01 and earlier vulnerable to firmware modification attacks. An attacker can conduct a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to modify the new firmware image and bypass the checksum verification. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1879 | 1 Huawei | 12 Hege-560, Hege-560 Firmware, Hege-570 and 9 more | 2023-02-03 | 3.9 Low |
| There is an improper integrity checking vulnerability on some huawei products. The software of the affected product has an improper integrity check which may allow an attacker with high privilege to make malicious modifications.Affected product versions include:HEGE-560 versions 1.0.1.21(SP3);HEGE-570 versions 1.0.1.22(SP3);OSCA-550 versions 1.0.1.21(SP3);OSCA-550A versions 1.0.1.21(SP3);OSCA-550AX versions 1.0.1.21(SP3);OSCA-550X versions 1.0.1.21(SP3). | ||||
| CVE-2020-13847 | 1 Sylabs | 1 Singularity | 2023-01-20 | 7.5 High |
| Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 lacks support for an Integrity Check. Singularity's sign and verify commands do not sign metadata found in the global header or data object descriptors of a SIF file. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13845 | 1 Sylabs | 1 Singularity | 2023-01-20 | 7.5 High |
| Sylabs Singularity 3.0 through 3.5 has Improper Validation of an Integrity Check Value. Image integrity is not validated when an ECL policy is enforced. The fingerprint required by the ECL is compared against the signature object descriptor(s) in the SIF file, rather than to a cryptographically validated signature. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46402 | 1 Microchip | 18 Bm70, Bm70 Firmware, Bm71 and 15 more | 2022-12-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Microchip RN4870 module firmware 1.43 (and the Microchip PIC LightBlue Explorer Demo 4.2 DT100112) accepts PairCon_rmSend with incorrect values. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35961 | 1 Openzeppelin | 2 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable | 2022-12-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8838 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Assetexplorer | 2022-10-07 | 6.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Zoho ManageEngine AssetExplorer 6.5. During an upgrade of the Windows agent, it does not validate the source and binary downloaded. This allows an attacker on an adjacent network to execute code with NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM privileges on the agent machines by providing an arbitrary executable via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12973 | 1 Connect2id | 1 Nimbus Jose\+jwt | 2022-10-03 | N/A |
| Nimbus JOSE+JWT before 4.39 proceeds improperly after detection of an invalid HMAC in authenticated AES-CBC decryption, which allows attackers to conduct a padding oracle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39844 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch Pc | 2022-09-21 | 7.1 High |
| Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Smart Switch PC prior to version 4.3.22083 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39845 | 1 Samsung | 1 Kies | 2022-09-21 | 7.1 High |
| Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung Kies prior to version 2.6.4.22074 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29549 | 1 Qualys | 1 Cloud Agent For Linux | 2022-09-15 | 7.3 High |
| An issue was discovered in Qualys Cloud Agent 4.8.0-49. It executes programs at various full pathnames without first making ownership and permission checks (e.g., to help ensure that a program was installed by root) and without integrity checks (e.g., a checksum comparison against known legitimate programs). Also, the vendor recommendation is to install this agent software with root privileges. Thus, privilege escalation is possible on systems where any of these pathnames is controlled by a non-root user. An example is /opt/firebird/bin/isql, where the /opt/firebird directory is often owned by the firebird user. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36174 | 1 Freshworks | 1 Freshservice Agent | 2022-09-15 | 8.1 High |
| FreshService Windows Agent < 2.11.0 and FreshService macOS Agent < 4.2.0 and FreshService Linux Agent < 3.3.0. are vulnerable to Broken integrity checking via the FreshAgent client and scheduled update service. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30316 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Safety Manager, Safety Manager Firmware | 2022-08-05 | 6.8 Medium |
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager 5.02 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0054, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager unauthenticated firmware update issue. The affected components are characterized as: Firmware update functionality. The potential impact is: Firmware manipulation. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager utilizes the DCOM-232/485 communication FTA serial interface and Enea POLO bootloader for firmware management purposes. An engineering workstation running the Safety Builder software communicates via serial or serial-over-ethernet link with the DCOM-232/485 interface. Firmware images were found to have no authentication (in the form of firmware signing) and only relied on insecure checksums for regular integrity checks. Firmware images are unsigned. An attacker with access to the serial interface (either through physical access, a compromised EWS or an exposed serial-to-ethernet gateway) can utilize hardcoded credentials (see FSCT-2022-0052) for the POLO bootloader to control the boot process and push malicious firmware images to the controller allowing for firmware manipulation, remote code execution and denial of service impacts. A mitigating factor is that in order for a firmware update to be initiated, the Safety Manager has to be rebooted which is typically done by means of physical controls on the Safety Manager itself. As such, an attacker would have to either lay dormant until a legitimate reboot occurs or possibly attempt to force a reboot through a secondary vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33711 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android Usb Driver | 2022-07-19 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones prior to version 1.7.56.0 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction. | ||||
| CVE-2021-37182 | 1 Siemens | 34 Scalance Xm408-4c, Scalance Xm408-4c Firmware, Scalance Xm408-4c L3 and 31 more | 2022-06-27 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE XM408-4C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-4C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-8C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM408-8C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM416-4C (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XM416-4C (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 24V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR524-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 1x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 24V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 24V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230V (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR526-8C, 2x230V (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (2HR2, L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR528-6M (L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2) (All versions < V6.5), SCALANCE XR552-12M (2HR2, L3 int.) (All versions < V6.5). The OSPF protocol implementation in affected devices fails to verify the checksum and length fields in the OSPF LS Update messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause interruptions in the network by sending specially crafted OSPF packets. Successful exploitation requires OSPF to be enabled on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21757 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 24 Android, Mt6833, Mt6853 and 21 more | 2022-06-13 | 7.5 High |
| In WIFI Firmware, there is a possible system crash due to a missing count check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06468894; Issue ID: ALPS06468894. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29898 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 6 Rad-ism-900-en-bd, Rad-ism-900-en-bd-bus, Rad-ism-900-en-bd-bus Firmware and 3 more | 2022-05-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| On various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT an admin user could use the configuration file uploader in the WebUI to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the OS due to an improper validation of an integrity check value in all versions of the firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29173 | 1 Theupdateframework | 1 Go-tuf | 2022-05-17 | 8.8 High |
| go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). go-tuf does not correctly implement the client workflow for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities. In more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks: 1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. 2. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow). A fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer. No workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25946 | 1 F5 | 4 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager and 1 more | 2022-05-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| On all versions of 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x of F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, ASM, and ASM, and F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC) all versions prior to 9.0, when running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker with Administrator role privilege may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions due to a missing integrity check in F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2022-22781 | 1 Zoom | 1 Meetings | 2022-05-09 | 7.5 High |
| The Zoom Client for Meetings for MacOS (Standard and for IT Admin) prior to version 5.9.6 failed to properly check the package version during the update process. This could lead to a malicious actor updating an unsuspecting user’s currently installed version to a less secure version. | ||||