Filtered by vendor Snapone Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ovrc-300-pro Subscriptions
Total 6 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-25183 1 Snapone 2 Orvc, Ovrc-300-pro 2023-05-31 7.2 High
In Snap One OvrC Pro versions prior to 7.2, when logged into the superuser account, a new functionality appears that could allow users to execute arbitrary commands on the hub device.
CVE-2023-31245 2 Control4, Snapone 13 Ca-1, Ca-10, Ea-1 and 10 more 2023-05-31 6.1 Medium
Devices using Snap One OvrC cloud are sent to a web address when accessing a web management interface using a HTTP connection. Attackers could impersonate a device and supply malicious information about the device’s web server interface. By supplying malicious parameters, an attacker could redirect the user to arbitrary and dangerous locations on the web.
CVE-2023-31241 2 Control4, Snapone 13 Ca-1, Ca-10, Ea-1 and 10 more 2023-05-31 10.0 Critical
Snap One OvrC cloud servers contain a route an attacker can use to bypass requirements and claim devices outright.
CVE-2023-28649 1 Snapone 2 Orvc, Ovrc-300-pro 2023-05-30 7.5 High
The Hub in the Snap One OvrC cloud platform is a device used to centralize and manage nested devices connected to it. A vulnerability exists in which an attacker could impersonate a hub and send device requests to claim already claimed devices. The OvrC cloud platform receives the requests but does not validate if the found devices are already managed by another user.
CVE-2023-28412 2 Control4, Snapone 13 Ca-1, Ca-10, Ea-1 and 10 more 2023-05-30 5.3 Medium
When supplied with a random MAC address, Snap One OvrC cloud servers will return information about the device. The MAC address of devices can be enumerated in an attack and the OvrC cloud will disclose their information.
CVE-2023-28386 2 Control4, Snapone 13 Ca-1, Ca-10, Ea-1 and 10 more 2023-05-27 9.8 Critical
Snap One OvrC Pro devices versions 7.2 and prior do not validate firmware updates correctly. The device only calculates the MD5 hash of the firmware and does not check using a private-public key mechanism. The lack of complete PKI system firmware signature could allow attackers to upload arbitrary firmware updates, resulting in code execution.