Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Cloudforms Management Engine
Subscriptions
Total
42 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1740 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Ansible and 3 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Engine when using Ansible Vault for editing encrypted files. When a user executes "ansible-vault edit", another user on the same computer can read the old and new secret, as it is created in a temporary file with mkstemp and the returned file descriptor is closed and the method write_data is called to write the existing secret in the file. This method will delete the file before recreating it insecurely. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1739 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Ansible and 3 more | 2023-11-07 | 3.9 Low |
| A flaw was found in Ansible 2.7.16 and prior, 2.8.8 and prior, and 2.9.5 and prior when a password is set with the argument "password" of svn module, it is used on svn command line, disclosing to other users within the same node. An attacker could take advantage by reading the cmdline file from that particular PID on the procfs. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1738 | 1 Redhat | 4 Ansible, Ansible Tower, Cloudforms Management Engine and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 3.9 Low |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Engine when the module package or service is used and the parameter 'use' is not specified. If a previous task is executed with a malicious user, the module sent can be selected by the attacker using the ansible facts file. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1736 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 5 Fedora, Ansible, Ansible Tower and 2 more | 2023-11-07 | 3.3 Low |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Engine when a file is moved using atomic_move primitive as the file mode cannot be specified. This sets the destination files world-readable if the destination file does not exist and if the file exists, the file could be changed to have less restrictive permissions before the move. This could lead to the disclosure of sensitive data. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1735 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Ansible and 3 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible Engine when the fetch module is used. An attacker could intercept the module, inject a new path, and then choose a new destination path on the controller node. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1733 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Ansible and 3 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 Medium |
| A race condition flaw was found in Ansible Engine 2.7.17 and prior, 2.8.9 and prior, 2.9.6 and prior when running a playbook with an unprivileged become user. When Ansible needs to run a module with become user, the temporary directory is created in /var/tmp. This directory is created with "umask 77 && mkdir -p <dir>"; this operation does not fail if the directory already exists and is owned by another user. An attacker could take advantage to gain control of the become user as the target directory can be retrieved by iterating '/proc/<pid>/cmdline'. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14905 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Backports Sle, Leap and 5 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Ansible Engine versions 2.9.x before 2.9.3, 2.8.x before 2.8.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.16 and earlier, where in Ansible's nxos_file_copy module can be used to copy files to a flash or bootflash on NXOS devices. Malicious code could craft the filename parameter to perform OS command injections. This could result in a loss of confidentiality of the system among other issues. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2653 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| A number of unused delete routes are present in CloudForms before 5.7.2.1 which can be accessed via GET requests instead of just POST requests. This could allow an attacker to bypass the protect_from_forgery XSRF protection causing the routes to be used. This attack would require additional cross-site scripting or similar attacks in order to execute. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7071 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| It was found that the CloudForms before 5.6.2.2, and 5.7.0.7 did not properly apply permissions controls to VM IDs passed by users. A remote, authenticated attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary VMs on systems managed by CloudForms if they know the ID of the VM. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7047 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-11-07 | N/A |
| A flaw was found in the CloudForms API before 5.6.3.0, 5.7.3.1 and 5.8.1.2. A user with permissions to use the MiqReportResults capability within the API could potentially view data from other tenants or groups to which they should not have access. | ||||
| CVE-2018-10854 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| cloudforms version, cloudforms 5.8 and cloudforms 5.9, is vulnerable to a cross-site-scripting. A flaw was found in CloudForms's v2v infrastructure mapping delete feature. A stored cross-site scripting due to improper sanitization of user input in Name field. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4172 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-13 | N/A |
| The Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine 5.1 allow remote administrators to execute arbitrary Ruby code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2050 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms Management Engine, Manageiq Enterprise Virtualization Manager | 2023-02-13 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the miq_policy controller in Red Hat CloudForms 2.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.1 and ManageIQ Enterprise Virtualization Manager 5.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the profile[] parameter in an explorer action. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7502 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-13 | N/A |
| Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0197 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header | ||||
| CVE-2014-0087 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-13 | N/A |
| The check_privileges method in vmdb/app/controllers/application_controller.rb in ManageIQ, as used in Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine (CFME), allows remote authenticated users to bypass authorization and gain privileges by leveraging improper RBAC checking, related to the rbac_user_edit action. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14894 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 7.2 High |
| A flaw was found in the CloudForms management engine version 5.10 and CloudForms management version 5.11, which triggered remote code execution through NFS schedule backup. An attacker logged into the management console could use this flaw to execute arbitrary shell commands on the CloudForms server as root. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7497 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | N/A |
| The dialog for creating cloud volumes (cinder provider) in CloudForms does not filter cloud tenants by user. An attacker with the ability to create storage volumes could use this to create storage volumes for any other tenant. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2639 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | N/A |
| It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5402 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | N/A |
| A code injection flaw was found in the way capacity and utilization imported control files are processed. A remote, authenticated attacker with access to the capacity and utilization feature could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code as the user CFME runs as. | ||||