Filtered by vendor Glpi-project
Subscriptions
Total
140 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-21314 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2021-03-09 | 4.8 Medium |
| GLPI is open source software which stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and it is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package. In GLPI before verison 9.5.4, there is an XSS vulnerability involving a logged in user while updating a ticket. | ||||
| CVE-2021-21258 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2021-03-09 | 5.4 Medium |
| GLPI is an open-source asset and IT management software package that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. In GLPI from version 9.5.0 and before version 9.5.4, there is a cross-site scripting injection vulnerability when using ajax/kanban.php. This is fixed in version 9.5.4. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26212 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-12-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and it is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. In GLPI before version 9.5.3, any authenticated user has read-only permissions to the planning of every other user, even admin ones. Steps to reproduce the behavior: 1. Create a new planning with 'eduardo.mozart' user (from 'IT' group that belongs to 'Super-admin') into it's personal planning at 'Assistance' > 'Planning'. 2. Copy the CalDAV url and use a CalDAV client (e.g. Thunderbird) to sync the planning with the provided URL. 3. Inform the username and password from any valid user (e.g. 'camila' from 'Proativa' group). 4. 'Camila' has read-only access to 'eduardo.mozart' personal planning. The same behavior happens to any group. E.g. 'Camila' has access to 'IT' group planning, even if she doesn't belong to this group and has a 'Self-service' profile permission). This issue is fixed in version 9.5.3. As a workaround, one can remove the `caldav.php` file to block access to CalDAV server. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15177 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-10-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| In GLPI before version 9.5.2, the `install/install.php` endpoint insecurely stores user input into the database as `url_base` and `url_base_api`. These settings are referenced throughout the application and allow for vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting and Insecure Redirection Since authentication is not required to perform these changes,anyone could point these fields at malicious websites or form input in a way to trigger XSS. Leveraging JavaScript it's possible to steal cookies, perform actions as the user, etc. The issue is patched in version 9.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15176 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-10-16 | 8.6 High |
| In GLPI before version 9.5.2, when supplying a back tick in input that gets put into a SQL query,the application does not escape or sanitize allowing for SQL Injection to occur. Leveraging this vulnerability an attacker is able to exfiltrate sensitive information like passwords, reset tokens, personal details, and more. The issue is patched in version 9.5.2 | ||||
| CVE-2020-15217 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-10-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| In GLPI before version 9.5.2, there is a leakage of user information through the public FAQ. The issue was introduced in version 9.5.0 and patched in 9.5.2. As a workaround, disable public access to the FAQ. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15226 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-10-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| In GLPI before version 9.5.2, there is a SQL Injection in the API's search function. Not only is it possible to break the SQL syntax, but it is also possible to utilise a UNION SELECT query to reflect sensitive information such as the current database version, or database user. The most likely scenario for this vulnerability is with someone who has an API account to the system. The issue is patched in version 9.5.2. A proof-of-concept with technical details is available in the linked advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11031 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-10-05 | 7.5 High |
| In GLPI before version 9.5.0, the encryption algorithm used is insecure. The security of the data encrypted relies on the password used, if a user sets a weak/predictable password, an attacker could decrypt data. This is fixed in version 9.5.0 by using a more secure encryption library. The library chosen is sodium. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14666 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-08-24 | 8.8 High |
| GLPI through 9.4.3 is prone to account takeover by abusing the ajax/autocompletion.php autocompletion feature. The lack of correct validation leads to recovery of the token generated via the password reset functionality, and thus an authenticated attacker can set an arbitrary password for any user. This vulnerability can be exploited to take control of admin account. This vulnerability could be also abused to obtain other sensitive fields like API keys or password hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10233 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-08-24 | 8.1 High |
| Teclib GLPI before 9.4.1.1 is affected by a timing attack associated with a cookie. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1010310 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-08-24 | N/A |
| GLPI GLPI Product 9.3.1 is affected by: Frame and Form tags Injection allowing admins to phish users by putting code in reminder description. The impact is: Admins can phish any user or group of users for credentials / credit cards. The component is: Tools > Reminder > Description .. Set the description to any iframe/form tags and apply. The attack vector is: The attacker puts a login form, the user fills it and clicks on submit .. the request is sent to the attacker domain saving the data. The fixed version is: 9.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15108 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-07-22 | 7.1 High |
| In glpi before 9.5.1, there is a SQL injection for all usages of "Clone" feature. This has been fixed in 9.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5248 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-05-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| GLPI before before version 9.4.6 has a vulnerability involving a default encryption key. GLPIKEY is public and is used on every instance. This means anyone can decrypt sensitive data stored using this key. It is possible to change the key before installing GLPI. But on existing instances, data must be reencrypted with the new key. Problem is we can not know which columns or rows in the database are using that; espcially from plugins. Changing the key without updating data would lend in bad password sent from glpi; but storing them again from the UI will work. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11062 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-05-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| In GLPI after 0.68.1 and before 9.4.6, multiple reflexive XSS occur in Dropdown endpoints due to an invalid Content-Type. This has been fixed in version 9.4.6. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11032 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2020-05-07 | 7.2 High |
| In GLPI before version 9.4.6, there is a SQL injection vulnerability for all helpdesk instances. Exploiting this vulnerability requires a technician account. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2227 | 2 Debian, Glpi-project | 2 Debian Linux, Glpi | 2019-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| GLPI 0.83.7 has Local File Inclusion in common.tabs.php. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1010307 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2019-07-18 | N/A |
| GLPI GLPI Product 9.3.1 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: All dropdown values are vulnerable to XSS leading to privilege escalation and executing js on admin. The component is: /glpi/ajax/getDropDownValue.php. The attack vector is: 1- User Create a ticket , 2- Admin opens another ticket and click on the "Link Tickets" feature, 3- a request to the endpoint fetches js and executes it. | ||||
| CVE-2019-13240 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2019-07-17 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in GLPI before 9.4.1. After a successful password reset by a user, it is possible to change that user's password again during the next 24 hours without any information except the associated email address. | ||||
| CVE-2019-13239 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2019-07-08 | N/A |
| inc/user.class.php in GLPI before 9.4.3 allows XSS via a user picture. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10477 | 2 Fusioninventory, Glpi-project | 2 Fusioninventory, Glpi | 2019-04-01 | N/A |
| The FusionInventory plugin before 1.4 for GLPI 9.3.x and before 1.1 for GLPI 9.4.x mishandles sendXML actions. | ||||