Total
1120 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-29035 | 2024-06-04 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| Umbraco is an ASP.NET CMS. Failing webhooks logs are available when solution is not in debug mode. Those logs can contain information that is critical. This vulnerability is fixed in 13.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29021 | 2024-06-04 | 9.0 Critical | ||
| Judge0 is an open-source online code execution system. The default configuration of Judge0 leaves the service vulnerable to a sandbox escape via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This allows an attacker with sufficient access to the Judge0 API to obtain unsandboxed code execution as root on the target machine. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29030 | 2024-06-04 | 5.8 Medium | ||
| memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /api/resource that allows authenticated users to enumerate the internal network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4562 | 2024-06-04 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.2 , an SSRF vulnerability exists in Whatsup Gold's Issue exists in the HTTP Monitoring functionality. Due to the lack of proper authorization, any authenticated user can access the HTTP monitoring functionality, what leads to the Server Side Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4561 | 2024-06-04 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2023.1.2 , a blind SSRF vulnerability exists in Whatsup Gold's FaviconController that allows an attacker to send arbitrary HTTP requests on behalf of the vulnerable server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22329 | 2024-06-04 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 24.0.0.3 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to conduct the SSRF attack. X-Force ID: 279951. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32812 | 2024-06-04 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher.This issue affects Podlove Podcast Publisher: from n/a through 4.0.11. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32454 | 2024-06-04 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Wappointment Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment.This issue affects Appointment Bookings for Zoom GoogleMeet and more – Wappointment: from n/a through 2.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32718 | 2024-06-04 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Webangon The Pack Elementor.This issue affects The Pack Elementor addons: from n/a through 2.0.8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27775 | 2024-06-04 | 7.2 High | ||
| SysAid before version 23.2.14 b18 - CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) may allow exposing the local OS user's NTLMv2 hash | ||||
| CVE-2024-27098 | 2024-06-04 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| GLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, Data center management, ITIL Service Desk, licenses tracking and software auditing. An authenticated user can execute a SSRF based attack using Arbitrary Object Instantiation. This issue has been patched in version 10.0.13. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27949 | 2024-06-04 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in sirv.Com Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv.This issue affects Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv: from n/a through 7.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27347 | 2024-06-04 | N/A | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache HugeGraph-Hubble.This issue affects Apache HugeGraph-Hubble: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23500 | 2024-06-04 | 7.7 High | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kadence WP Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks.This issue affects Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks: from n/a through 3.2.19. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33592 | 2024-06-04 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33634 | 2024-06-04 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Piotnet Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro.This issue affects Piotnet Addons For Elementor Pro: from n/a through 7.1.17. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33590 | 2024-06-04 | 5.0 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in codeSavory Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress.This issue affects Knowledge Base documentation & wiki plugin – BasePress: from n/a through 2.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33627 | 2024-06-04 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Cusmin Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin.This issue affects Absolutely Glamorous Custom Admin: from n/a through 7.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34351 | 2024-06-04 | 7.5 High | ||
| Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in Next.js Server Actions. If the `Host` header is modified, and the below conditions are also met, an attacker may be able to make requests that appear to be originating from the Next.js application server itself. The required conditions are 1) Next.js is running in a self-hosted manner; 2) the Next.js application makes use of Server Actions; and 3) the Server Action performs a redirect to a relative path which starts with a `/`. This vulnerability was fixed in Next.js `14.1.1`. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20332 | 2024-06-04 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials. | ||||