Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscriptions
Total
144 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3192 | 3 Fedoraproject, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Fedora, Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.14 and 4.x before 4.1.7 do not properly process inline DTD declarations when DTD is not entirely disabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and out-of-memory errors) via a crafted XML file. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0201 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| The Java SockJS client in Pivotal Spring Framework 4.1.x before 4.1.5 generates predictable session ids, which allows remote attackers to send messages to other sessions via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9878 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.18, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5. Paths provided to the ResourceServlet were not properly sanitized and as a result exposed to directory traversal attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1258 | 5 Netapp, Oracle, Pivotal Software and 2 more | 42 Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Unified Manager, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 39 more | 2022-04-11 | 8.8 High |
| Spring Framework version 5.0.5 when used in combination with any versions of Spring Security contains an authorization bypass when using method security. An unauthorized malicious user can gain unauthorized access to methods that should be restricted. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6429 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| The SourceHttpMessageConverter in Spring MVC in Spring Framework before 3.2.5 and 4.0.0.M1 through 4.0.0.RC1 does not disable external entity resolution, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, cause a denial of service, and conduct CSRF attacks via crafted XML, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, and a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-4152 and CVE-2013-7315. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0225 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3625 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2022-04-11 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Pivotal Spring Framework 3.0.4 through 3.2.x before 3.2.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.8, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors, related to static resource handling. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8046 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Data Rest, Spring Boot | 2022-04-07 | N/A |
| Malicious PATCH requests submitted to servers using Spring Data REST versions prior to 2.6.9 (Ingalls SR9), versions prior to 3.0.1 (Kay SR1) and Spring Boot versions prior to 1.5.9, 2.0 M6 can use specially crafted JSON data to run arbitrary Java code. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5419 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Rabbitmq, Rabbitmq | 2022-03-17 | 6.7 Medium |
| RabbitMQ versions 3.8.x prior to 3.8.7 are prone to a Windows-specific binary planting security vulnerability that allows for arbitrary code execution. An attacker with write privileges to the RabbitMQ installation directory and local access on Windows could carry out a local binary hijacking (planting) attack and execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9877 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Rabbitmq, Rabbitmq | 2022-03-17 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12, and 1.7.x before 1.7.7. MQTT (MQ Telemetry Transport) connection authentication with a username/password pair succeeds if an existing username is provided but the password is omitted from the connection request. Connections that use TLS with a client-provided certificate are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3802 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Data Java Persistance Api | 2021-10-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| This affects Spring Data JPA in versions up to and including 2.1.6, 2.0.14 and 1.11.20. ExampleMatcher using ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.STARTING, ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.ENDING or ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.CONTAINING could return more results than anticipated when a maliciously crafted example value is supplied. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5173 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving emails with password recovery links, aka "Cross Domain Referer Leakage." | ||||
| CVE-2015-5172 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5171 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| The password change functionality in Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire existing sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5170 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 8.8 High |
| Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks on PWS and log a user into an arbitrary account by leveraging lack of CSRF checks. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2165 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Loggregator Traffic Controller endpoints in cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.5.19 AND 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.20 are not cleansing request URL paths when they are invalid and are returning them in the 404 response. This could allow malicious scripts to be written directly into the 404 response. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0780 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| It was discovered that cf-release v231 and lower, Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.5.x versions prior to 1.5.17 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18 do not properly enforce disk quotas in certain cases. An attacker could use an improper disk quota value to bypass enforcement and consume all the disk on DEAs/CELLs causing a potential denial of service for other applications. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0761 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Garden Linux, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime | 2021-08-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Cloud Foundry Garden-Linux versions prior to v0.333.0 and Elastic Runtime 1.6.x version prior to 1.6.17 contain a flaw in managing container files during Docker image preparation that could be used to delete, corrupt or overwrite host files and directories, including other container filesystems on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3191 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cf-release, Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2021-08-25 | 8.8 High |
| With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. | ||||